2008 Alliance for CME Presentations

Veritas Institute is pleased to share information with our colleagues in the CME community.  If you would like to receive a copy of the slide presentations, we ask that you complete a brief evaluation.

To get started, please enter your e-mail address: 

Click on the presentation(s) you wish to download

Breakout Session  SU18.  “Navigating the Changing CME Landscape: Practical Approaches and Real‑World Solutions.”  Ann C. Lichti
Breakout Session  M22.  “The Deconstruction of Educational Outcomes Measurement: It’s Time to Get Real.”  Harold I. Magazine, PhD and Ann C. Lichti

Workshop Evaluation  Please help us assess these workshops by completing the evaluation below. Select the response(s) that best describe(s) your views.

  1. “Navigating the Changing CME Landscape: Practical Approaches and Real‑World Solutions”
Was of little or no educational value to me
Reinforced my current opinions/practices
Taught me something new/novel that I can apply to my daily practice
I did not attend this workshop How did you hear about Veritas Institute?
  1. “The Deconstruction of Educational Outcomes Measurement: It’s Time to Get Real”

Was of little or no educational value to me
Reinforced my current opinions/practices
Taught me something new/novel that I can apply to my daily practice
I did not attend this workshop How did you hear about Veritas Institute?

  1. How do you intend to use the workshop slides (select all that apply)?

Staff training
To sustain what I learned at the workshop(s)
To enhance my organization’s EOM methodologies
Other (please specify)

  1. If you attended the workshop, “Navigating the Changing CME Landscape: Practical Approaches and Real‑World Solutions,” please indicate the extent to which you feel the learning objectives were achieved.
  1. Identify common challenges of obtaining funding for CME activities

Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
Too early to tell

  1. Discuss unique approaches to grant proposal development

Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
Too early to tell

  1. Devise mechanisms for implementing EOM in CME activities

Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
Too early to tell

  1. Formulate strategies for educating internal staff and faculty about ACCME’s Updated Accreditation Criteria

Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
Too early to tell

  1. Based on this activity, I intend to incorporate at least 1 change within my organization.

Disagree
Agree
Too early to tell

  1. The expertise and effectiveness of the presenter (Ann C. Lichti) were appropriate for the activity.

Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree

  1. The educational design/format (interactive, case-based workshop) were appropriate for the topic and desired outcomes.

Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree

  1. I would rate this presentation as

Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

  1. Additional comments/tips for improvement

 

  1. “The Deconstruction of Educational Outcomes Measurement: It’s Time to Get Real”

Was of little or no educational value to me
Reinforced my current opinions/practices
Taught me something new/novel that I can apply to my daily practice
I did not attend this workshop

  1. If you attended the workshop “The Deconstruction of Educational Outcomes Measurement: It’s Time to Get Real,” please indicate the extent to which you feel the learning objectives were achieved.
  1. Identify and resolve common challenges to successful implementation of EOM

Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
Too early to tell

  1. Tailor EOM methodologies to evaluate achievement of the activity objectives

Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
Too early to tell

  1. Formulate strategies for educating internal staff and faculty about ACCME’s Updated Accreditation Criteria

Not achieved
Partially achieved
Achieved
Too early to tell

  1. Based on this activity, I intend to incorporate at least 1 change within my organization.

Disagree
Agree
Too early to tell

  1. The expertise and effectiveness of the presenter (Harold I. Magazine, PhD) was appropriate for the activity.

Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree

  1. The expertise and effectiveness of the presenter (Ann C. Lichti) was appropriate for the activity.

Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree

  1. The educational design/format (interactive workshop) was appropriate for the topics and desired outcomes.

Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree

  1. I would rate this presentation as
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
  1. Additional comments/tips for improvement

 

  1. Would you like Veritas Institute to share your evaluation with the Alliance for CME? (Note:  your e-mail address will not be shared in accordance with our privacy policy and terms of use.)

Yes
No